Here's what caused my latest rant on this final weekday of January.
The Los Angeles Times announced today they are laying off 300 jobs, including 70 in the newsroom, according to Bloomberg.
The explanation from corporate is that the cuts are necessary "to tackle record print advertising declines and $12.5 billion in debt."
But what really has people buzzing is the fact the Times announced today it is getting rid of its daily California Section (previously known as Metro), per LA Weekly. Content for the section will get moved to A Section, and inevitably it will be cut back.
Said Times reporter Howard Blume on the news: "I don't really know how this is going to work. The discussions have taken place well above my pay grade. There will still be a newspaper, and some of us will still be working here. And those folks will still do their darndest to put out a quality, relevant newspaper. And the rest of us will be looking for alternative employment. This is Journalism 2009."